Taking a dive into how the AUTOPEN works
When a sitting U.S. president issues a pardon, there’s no strict legal requirement that he must be physically present to sign the document himself, nor does the Constitution or federal law explicitly mandate a “wet” (handwritten) signature. The president’s pardon power, granted under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, is broad and discretionary, and the mechanics of how a pardon is executed have evolved with technology and precedent. Here’s how it works:
Traditional Process
Historically, a pardon is formalized through a written document—a warrant or clemency order—signed by the president. This document is typically prepared by the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the Department of Justice, then sent to the White House for the president’s approval and signature. The signed original is filed with the DOJ, and the recipient is notified. In this traditional sense, the president would physically sign the pardon, often as part of a ceremonial or deliberate act.
Use of Autopen
The autopen—a machine that replicates a person’s signature—has been used by presidents for various official documents since at least the mid-20th century. While there’s no explicit statute prohibiting its use for pardons, its application depends on intent and authorization:
-
Precedent: Presidents have used autopens for routine paperwork, including some official correspondence. For example, Dwight Eisenhower reportedly used it for letters, and it’s been employed for signing bills into law in rare cases (e.g., when a president is abroad). However, pardons are less routine and carry significant legal and symbolic weight, so presidents typically sign them personally to underscore their authority and decision.
-
Legal Validity: The validity of a pardon hinges on the president’s intent to grant it, not necessarily the method of signature. If a president authorizes an aide to use an autopen on his behalf, and this reflects his deliberate decision, courts would likely uphold the pardon. The Supreme Court has ruled (e.g., in United States v. Klein, 1871) that the pardon power is plenary, suggesting flexibility in execution as long as it’s clearly the president’s act.
Can an Aide Use the Autopen?
Yes, an aide could use an autopen to affix the president’s signature if explicitly directed to do so by the president. However:
-
Authorization: The president must approve the specific pardon and the use of the autopen. An aide acting unilaterally (without presidential consent) would lack authority, potentially invalidating the pardon.
-
Practicality: In practice, presidents rarely delegate pardon signatures to autopens because pardons are high-profile acts often accompanied by public announcements or personal review. For instance, President Obama’s commutation of Chelsea Manning’s sentence in 2017 involved a signed document, and Trump’s pardons (e.g., Michael Flynn in 2020) were similarly hands-on.
-
Historical Evidence: There’s no widely documented case of a pardon being issued via autopen, though it’s not definitively ruled out. The White House and DOJ tend to treat pardons as requiring direct presidential involvement, likely to avoid legal ambiguity or challenges.
Modern Flexibility
In emergencies or unusual circumstances (e.g., a president traveling or incapacitated but still competent), an autopen could theoretically be used if the president communicates clear intent. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, remote governance increased, but no public evidence suggests autopen pardons became standard. President Biden’s pardon of Hunter Biden in December 2024 was a signed document, consistent with tradition.
Conclusion
A sitting president doesn’t have to be physically present to sign a pardon himself; an aide could use an autopen if authorized. However, the gravity of the pardon power means presidents typically sign these documents personally to ensure clarity and avoid disputes. No law bans the autopen, but its use would depend on the president’s explicit direction, and it’s not a common practice for pardons based on historical norms.