{"id":294,"date":"2019-12-25T07:26:00","date_gmt":"2019-12-25T12:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/americaschallenges.wordpress.com\/?p=294"},"modified":"2019-12-25T07:26:00","modified_gmt":"2019-12-25T12:26:00","slug":"not-till-the-fat-lady-dances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/?p=294","title":{"rendered":"Not till the Fat lady Dances"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now that the House of Representatives has voted to impeach President Donald Trump, what is the constitutional status of the two articles of impeachment? Must they be transmitted to the Senate to trigger a trial, or could they be held back by the House until the Senate decides what the trial will look like, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi has hinted? <\/p>\n<p>The Constitution doesn\u2019t say how fast the articles must go to the Senate. Some modest delay is not inconsistent with the Constitution, or how both chambers usually work. <\/p>\n<p>But an indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial. <\/p>\n<p>If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn\u2019t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn\u2019t truly impeached at all. <\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s because \u201cimpeachment\u201d under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached. <\/p>\n<p>As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, \u201cTRUMP IMPEACHED,\u201d those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn\u2019t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message. <\/p>\n<p>Once the articles are sent, the Senate has a constitutional duty to hold a trial on the impeachment charges presented. Failure for the Senate to hold a trial after impeachment would deviate from the Constitution\u2019s clear expectation. <\/p>\n<p>For the House to vote \u201cto impeach\u201d without ever sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not genuinely been impeached under the Constitution; and it would also deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the Constitution provides. <\/p>\n<p>The relevant constitutional provisions are brief. Article I gives the House \u201cthe sole power of impeachment.\u201d And it gives the Senate \u201cthe sole power to try all impeachments.\u201d Article II says that the president \u201cshall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Putting these three different provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he is in office is if the House impeaches him and the Senate tries and convicts him. <\/p>\n<p>The provisions say nothing about timing. Taken literally, they don\u2019t directly say that articles of impeachment passed by the House must be sent to the Senate. But the framers\u2019 definition of impeachment assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote. <\/p>\n<p>The framers drafted the constitutional provisions against the backdrop of impeachment as it had been practiced in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachments. The whole point of impeachment by the Commons was for the charges of impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of Lords. <\/p>\n<p>Strictly speaking, \u201cimpeachment\u201d occurred \u2013 and occurs &#8212; when the articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate for trial. And at that point, the Senate is obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial. <\/p>\n<p>What would make that trial fair is a separate question, one that deserves its own discussion. But we can say with some confidence that only the Senate is empowered to judge the fairness of its own trial \u2013 that\u2019s what the \u201csole power to try all impeachments\u201d means. <\/p>\n<p>If the House votes to \u201cimpeach\u201d but doesn\u2019t send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers there to carry its message, it hasn\u2019t directly violated the text of the Constitution. But the House would be acting against the implicit logic of the Constitution\u2019s description of impeachment. <\/p>\n<p>A president who has been genuinely impeached must constitutionally have the opportunity to defend himself before the Senate. That\u2019s built into the constitutional logic of impeachment, which demands a trial before removal. <\/p>\n<p>To be sure, if the House just never sends its articles of impeachment to the Senate, there can be no trial there. That\u2019s what the \u201csole power to impeach\u201d means. <\/p>\n<p>But if the House never sends the articles, then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached. And that\u2019s probably not the message Congressional Democrats are hoping to send.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that the House of Representatives has voted to impeach President Donald Trump, what is the constitutional status of the two articles of impeachment? Must they be transmitted to the Senate to trigger a trial, or could they be held back by the House until the Senate decides what the trial will look like, as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-democrat-fraud","category-dnc-lies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kendreger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}