The U.S. Constitution grants the president authority to make trade deals primarily through the executive power outlined in Article II, Section 2, which includes the ability to negotiate treaties and conduct foreign affairs. While trade agreements are often considered “treaties” in a broad sense, they derive from the president’s role as the chief diplomat and executor of U.S. foreign policy. However, this authority is shared with Congress, which holds significant power over trade under Article I, Section 8, giving it the ability to “regulate commerce with foreign nations” and approve certain agreements.
Here’s how the president’s authority to make trade deals operates:
-
Negotiation of Trade Agreements:
-
The president, through the Executive Branch (often via the U.S. Trade Representative, or USTR), has the authority to negotiate trade agreements with foreign nations. This stems from the president’s role in conducting foreign policy and managing international relations.
-
These negotiations can cover tariffs, trade barriers, intellectual property, and other economic issues. For example, the president can initiate and negotiate deals like the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
-
-
Congressional Involvement:
-
While the president can negotiate trade deals, Congress must often approve them, especially if they require changes to U.S. law (e.g., tariff adjustments or regulatory changes). This is because Congress has the constitutional power to regulate commerce.
-
For major trade agreements, Congress may grant the president Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), also known as “fast-track” authority. TPA allows the president to negotiate trade deals that Congress can approve or reject without amending, streamlining the process. TPA was used, for instance, during the negotiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
-
-
Executive Agreements:
-
The president can enter into executive agreements with other countries without Senate approval, as these are not formal treaties requiring a two-thirds Senate vote (per Article II, Section 2). Many modern trade deals are structured as executive agreements, allowing the president to act more independently.
-
For example, smaller trade deals or modifications to existing agreements (like tariff adjustments) can often be implemented through executive action under existing statutory authority.
-
-
Statutory Authority:
-
Congress has delegated some trade authority to the president through laws like the Trade Act of 1974 or the Tariff Act of 1930. These laws allow the president to impose tariffs, adjust trade policies, or negotiate certain trade terms within defined limits.
-
For instance, under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the president can impose tariffs or restrictions on imports for national security reasons, as seen with steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018.
-
-
Limitations:
-
The president’s authority is not absolute. Congress can challenge or override trade actions through legislation, and the judiciary can review executive actions for compliance with the law (e.g., if tariffs exceed statutory authority).
-
Trade deals requiring significant changes to U.S. law (e.g., tax or regulatory changes) need Congressional approval, often through both the House and Senate.
-
-
Practical Examples:
-
USMCA (2020): President Trump negotiated the USMCA to replace NAFTA. Congress granted TPA, allowing the deal to be negotiated and then approved by a simple majority in both chambers.
-
Tariffs on China (2018-2019): President Trump used executive authority under existing trade laws to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, citing national security and economic concerns, without needing new Congressional approval.
-
In summary, the president’s authority to make trade deals comes from a combination of constitutional executive powers, delegated authority from Congress, and the ability to enter executive agreements. However, Congress retains significant oversight, especially for major agreements or changes to domestic law.